FAMILY

i have to say how arrogant politicians can be when they seek to represent the diverse population of the united states and it's entire demographic and yet choose to define "family" as a man/wife and children. can someone please tell me? can someone please tell me how honest and unbiased a person can be if elected to have the best interests of the entire country at mind when they proceed to make decisions based upon personal belief systems and antiquated ethics of a certain segment of the population? Speaking of, my mother's church of 34 years just shut down because like the Shakers their principles did not change with an evolving complex society. They were unable to "recruit" new members to their, as we would call it in sociological terms, group, because their principles and the physical manifestations of their principles did not evolve with an ever changing society. They failed to be applicable and tangible to a modern society. The group constituants grew old and died, thus ending both organizations. Screw an historic election with a woman and a black man running. McCain is trying to set himself up a competition versus proving he can be monumental. His VP choice makes me laugh and he's created an aura of buffoonary to mock the fact that in this election year there will be a guaranteed first. (excuse my french, but how much do we really care who has a pussy and who has a different skin color? Don't we care about personhood and equality?) He didn't choose with discernment someone who would represent a country. She represents a value system that will continue to discriminate against equal rights for all people who's definition of family is evolving in a complex society. Who really has the best interests of a diverse population in mind?